Report Inappropriate Comments

For the DNR to use a hate group for its case with miss dated pictures, altered video, pictures taken by someone who befriended Dr. Rogers to get discriminating pictures, and a disgruntled fan who broke every rule at the bear course then took revenge, is one of the most unethical, non professional things I have seen a agency do. If you followed the case at all there was nothing but bias from the DNR. As far as the bears being targeted, look no further than the hate page that put the target on them, themselves by the way of a bango card listing all the bears they wanted targeted and killed. The name of the page is proof enough. They always put the blame on Dr. Rogers to take away their part in trying to destroy him. If there is any investigation it should be against the corruption of the DNR and a group of people who started the defamation, slander, and libel against Dr. Rogers and the WRI for no other reason than their own agenda, from people that have never even been to Mn. Dr. Rogers, Sue Mansfield owes them no explanation to what they know or how. As proof in the trial the DNR never bent over backwards to accommodate Dr. Rogers did everything according to the permit and it was the DNR that would not even meet with Dr .Rogers but ignored his request to meet with him. Dr. Rogers taught more people, more about the lives of bears than the DMR could ever hope to when it comes to education