Serving Northern St. Louis County, Minnesota

Poll finds growing opposition to sulfide mining near BWCAW

Marshall Helmberger
Posted 3/1/18

REGIONAL— Opposition to sulfide-based copper mining near the Boundary Waters is increasing in Minnesota and it could play a significant role in voters’ decisions in this year’s elections for …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

Log in

Poll finds growing opposition to sulfide mining near BWCAW

Posted

REGIONAL— Opposition to sulfide-based copper mining near the Boundary Waters is increasing in Minnesota and it could play a significant role in voters’ decisions in this year’s elections for both governor and the Eighth District congressional seat being vacated by Rick Nolan. That’s according to the findings of a new poll completed by FabrizioWard, a GOP-leaning polling firm that worked for both Donald Trump and Tim Pawlenty.

The Ely-based Campaign to Save the Boundary Waters commissioned the poll, which was completed in mid-February. The results showed that opposition to sulfide mining near the Boundary Waters has jumped significantly since FabrizioWard asked the same questions last year, with fully 70 percent of Minnesotans now saying they oppose the idea, up from 59 percent last year. Just 22 percent, or barely one-in-five Minnesotans say they support sulfide mining near the Boundary Waters.

The Chilean mining giant Antofagasta has proposed the so-called Twin Metals mine near Ely, but the plan has faced considerable opposition, mostly out of concern for its location near the Kawishiwi River, a major watershed within the 1.1 million-acre wilderness.

Opposition to the idea continues to grow in northeastern Minnesota as well, and could play a role in the hotly-contested Eighth District congressional race. That’s particularly so on the DFL side, where the poll found that 77 percent of DFLers in the Eighth District oppose proposed mining near the Boundary Waters, with fully 61 percent expressing strong opposition. Statewide, 91 percent of DFLers are opposed. Meanwhile, 69 percent of self-identified independents oppose the mining plan, and even a 45 percent plurality of Republicans oppose it.

The latest poll found that a clear majority (56 percent) of all residents in the Eighth District now oppose sulfide mining near the BWCAW. That’s a jump from the 49-percent opposition the poll found last year. Support for the idea remains roughly the same, at 39 percent.

The poll also finds that the intensity of voter opposition to sulfide mining is on the rise, with 52 percent of Minnesotans now saying that they strongly oppose sulfide mining near the wilderness. That’s an increase of 13 points from the 39 percent of residents who strongly opposed the idea last year.

Two-thirds of Minnesotans also said they support Gov. Mark Dayton’s order banning sulfide mining on state lands near the BWCAW, with 50 percent expressing strong support. Only 28 percent said they oppose the order, with only 18 percent expressing strong opposition. Dayton issued his order in an effort to block further development of the Twin Metals project, which he has criticized as a potential threat to water quality in the wilderness.

The poll found that the issue is potentially potent politically, with 53 percent of respondents saying they would be more likely to vote for a governor who promised to continue Dayton’s ban on the development of the Twin Metals project. Just 12 percent said they would be more likely to support a candidate who would end the ban, while 35 percent said it would not impact their vote.

The poll also found continued broad support for the two-year study and mineral development suspension established in the final weeks of the Obama administration. Seventy-eight percent of Minnesotans and 66 percent of Eighth District residents said they favored the study and the two-year pause in mineral development.

Comments

3 comments on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment
Mike Cole

This is supposed to be a statewide poll of eligible voters. If that is the case polling 800 people out of 3,972,330 eligible voters in Minnesota is a joke. That comes out to a paltry .02% which is such a small number that it is totally insignificant and useless in determining how the state as a whole looks at copper nickel mining. Even if you take the 800 and apply it to just the 8th District which covers 16 counties in central and Northeast Minnesota whose eligible voters total 362,370 it still only comes out to .22% which is still insignificant and is not a barometer of how people perceive copper nickel mining. The other funny thing after asking people around this area if they were polled concerning this the answer has been a resounding NO. So where exactly was this polling conducted. Just another attempt by the anti mining crowd to try and use smoke and mirrors to advance their agenda.

Friday, March 2
Steve Jacobson

My Brother's Nephew's Cousin's Sister's Boyfriend's Ex college Roommate did a poll and they said that they are all in favor of mining and Polymet. This poll obviously has the same validity as the one mentioned above!

Tuesday, March 6
jtormoen

Apparently the art of polling is no longer taught ... at least in the local northern MN schools.

Or am I mixing it up with the study of "rational thought"

Thursday, March 8