Serving Northern St. Louis County, Minnesota

Trump administration reopens Rainy River watershed to mining

Marshall Helmberger
Posted 9/6/18

REGIONAL— The Trump administration has lifted the temporary suspension of mineral leasing on 234,000 acres of the Superior National Forest located within the Rainy River watershed.

U.S. …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

Log in

Trump administration reopens Rainy River watershed to mining

Posted

REGIONAL— The Trump administration has lifted the temporary suspension of mineral leasing on 234,000 acres of the Superior National Forest located within the Rainy River watershed.

U.S. Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue made the announcement on Thursday, Sept. 6, clearing the way for potential mineral leasing to resume in the area. The move is not unexpected since President Trump had previously indicated his intention to lift the leasing moratorium, implemented by President Obama shortly before leaving office. The Trump administration, earlier this year, had reinstated mineral leases for the proposed Twin Metals copper-nickel mine, which were the only mineral leases ever issued in the affected area.

In a press statement, Perdue said the decision comes following “a thorough review” and after hearing from thousands of citizens. “It’s our duty as responsible stewards of our environment to maintain and protect our natural resources. At the same time, we must put our national forests to work for the taxpayers to support local economies and create jobs,” Perdue said. “We can do these two things at once: protect the integrity of the watershed and contribute to economic growth and stronger communities.”

The USDA press release incorrectly stated that the temporary suspension of mineral leasing, known as a segregation, was enacted in 2016. In fact, it was enacted in January of 2017, barely a week before President Trump took office. At the time, Forest Service officials had cited the mine’s “potential to generate and release water with elevated levels of acidity, metals, and other potential contaminants.” While the mine would likely include water treatment, the Forest Service noted that such treatment would need to be in place in perpetuity and noted “it is not at all certain that such maintenance and treatment can be assured over many decades.”

Given such concerns, the Forest Service had indicated its intent to prepare an environmental impact statement on the effects of enacting a 20-year mineral withdrawal on that portion of the Superior National Forest. The USDA’s latest announcement indicates that the agency review “included a mineral resources report, a biological and economic impact assessment, and potential impacts to water resources, wilderness areas, and cultural resources.” The agency claims that their analysis “did not reveal new scientific information.”

Environmental and conservation groups questioned whether the Trump administration conducted an actual review. “The administration ignored science and facts, and clearly did not complete a promised study on the social, economic and environmental harm that sulfide-ore copper mining would do to America’s most popular wilderness,” said Alex Falconer, executive director of the Campaign to Save the Boundary Waters. “There is no indication the required environmental assessment was ever completed nor was it ever put out for public comment, which is normal practice,” he said. The Forest Service had conducted initial public comment hearings as part of the scoping for the promised study, but no draft of the document was ever released for public consumption or comment.

“Trump’s decision is based solely on corrupt political impulses that ignore the Forest Service’s own science and expertise,” said Marc Fink, a Duluth attorney representing the Center for Biological Diversity in a lawsuit against the administration’s earlier decision to reinstate the Twin Metals mineral leases. “This decision shows the Trump administration’s utter contempt for the natural world and complete subservience to the mining industry,” Fink added.

Secretary Perdue had earlier promised members of Congress that he would complete the review and would make no final decision on the withdrawal until he had all the facts. “The Trump Administration broke it’s word to us, to Congress, and to the American people when it said it would finish the environmental assessment and base decisions on facts and science,” said Falconer, “It’s clear whose interest this administration is really serving, and it’s not that of the American people.”

Meanwhile, Jobs for Minnesotans, a Duluth-based group supporting the Twin Metals project, lauded the decision. “Today’s announcement from the U.S. Department of Agriculture is the right decision for Minnesota’s future and validates the existing environmental review process – which states the proper time to evaluate potential impacts of mining projects is after they have been proposed,” said the group in a statement. “This action upholds what Minnesotans who believe that a mining economy can coexist with a treasured environment have been saying for nearly two years.”

Comments

No comments on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment