Support the Timberjay by making a donation.

Serving Northern St. Louis County, Minnesota

Stauber's cowardice

In backing Trump's attempted election thievery, the congressman puts party over country

Posted 12/16/20

While Joe Biden is indisputably our President-elect following Monday’s vote by the Electoral College, residents of the Eighth District should not forget that their own elected member of …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

Log in

Stauber's cowardice

In backing Trump's attempted election thievery, the congressman puts party over country

Posted

While Joe Biden is indisputably our President-elect following Monday’s vote by the Electoral College, residents of the Eighth District should not forget that their own elected member of Congress signed onto a transparent attempt to overthrow the clear will of the American people, including the clear will of the people of Minnesota.
That’s not a small thing, and the fact that the U.S. Supreme Court, including all three Trump appointees, held firm against an unconstitutional attempt to install Donald Trump for a second term, does not negate the horror of an amicus brief to which Stauber and 125 other Republican members of Congress signed their names. That list should be displayed for years to come as the ultimate roll call of craven politicians.
By signing his name to this, Rep. Stauber threw in his lot with thieves. Despite all the fulminations by many Republicans about stolen elections, it was Trump and his minions who sought to steal the 2020 election through a number of half-baked strategies cooked up long before Election Day. Had the election been closer, and Trump’s team more competent, they might well have succeeded.
Donald Trump had every reason to think he would lose his bid for re-election, yet he somehow believed the Supreme Court might ultimately set aside the election results and the U.S. Constitution to keep him in power. He acknowledged as much in ramming through the appointment of Justice Amy Coney Barrett just ahead of the Nov. 3 election.
Trump didn’t care that America’s voters made their choice clear, electing Joe Biden by a 306-232 electoral vote margin and a popular vote advantage of more than seven million. He thought he had at least five votes on the nation’s highest court and he expected that if given the opportunity, no matter how preposterous the legal claims, they would ignore their obligation to the constitution and hand the election to him. He believed this was possible because Donald Trump has never understood the concepts of honor or principle, and it is unimaginable to him that others might actually believe in such things.
The Texas lawsuit to which Rep. Stauber attached his name was a complete fraud. As the Supreme Court noted, Texas had no standing to sue other states for how they conduct their elections, and the suit advanced no intelligible claim.
Further, the lawsuit was a virtual acknowledgement that Trump and his legal team had found no evidence of voter fraud. That’s why the suit shifted its legal arguments to suggest that the four states the suit named, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Georgia, had harmed Texas by instituting changes in their election rules without legislative approval.
Yet most states, including Minnesota and, yes, even Texas, had implemented similar changes in their election rules without legislative approval in response to the coronavirus outbreak. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott had, on his own authority, extended the deadline for early voting. And the Texas Supreme Court gave a clear wink and a nod to looser mail-in voting requirements, finding that local election officials had no obligation to investigate whether requests for mail-in ballots, based on disability or absence, were fully substantiated. As a result, Texas, like many other states, saw record increases in both early and mail-in voting. But these changes were only a problem, apparently, in states that Biden managed to flip to his win column. In other words, voting for Biden was the real crime of these four states.
Even more appalling than the hypocrisy of the case was the astonishing logical disconnects. The Texas lawsuit wanted to invalidate the votes of millions of residents of the four states, but only their votes for president. The fact that those same ballots also elected Republican office holders in many other races was to be ignored.
Yet the Trump team’s incompetence obscures the dangerous implications of their attempt to overturn the election. Given the lack of evidence, the Trump team had little realistic hope in the courts, but that was only part of the game plan. Trump’s false claims were also meant to convince enough of his base of his lies that they would join him in pressuring governors, secretaries of state, and state legislators to use their raw political power to overturn the election results if the courts refused to do so. Though unsuccessful this time, it is an incredibly dangerous precedent, that may haunt this country for years
Fortunately for America, there were some courageous Republican officials, mostly at the state level, who refused to bow to Trump’s pressure and personal attacks. In so doing, they stood up for country over party. When given that same opportunity, Rep. Stauber sided with would-be thieves and his fellow political cowards. Voters in the Eighth District shouldn’t forget.

Comments

5 comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here

  • brianlafrenier@hotmail.com

    It's not surprising that Pete Stauber would throw his hat in with a baseless lawsuit. After all, in his campaign he touted Trump's lies about opening up the Range and voting for Democrats would mean that you get your car taken away, they would ban cows, and they are against mining. He claimed that his opponent Quinn Nystom had a casual relationship with the truth when in fact he is the one with a causal relationship with the truth. Many letters to the editor in the Duluth News Tribune have been written about Pete signing on to this Texas Lawsuit expressing their dismay with his action. In fact, the editor too expressed their concern about this action of his. I can't imagine what his reason for this was as he has not returned two letters that I have written to him. He doesn't represent me at all. I thought that maybe since he was a Hockey player he had learned to accept defeat like a good player does.

    Thursday, December 17, 2020 Report this

  • jbassing@frontiernet.net

    Brian,

    Somehow Stauber, who was a very good hockey player, never learned to accept defeat.. it seems Stauber only learned to cheat when needing to ensure victory. During the NCAA finals in 1988.his team was playing St. Lawrence to a 3-3 tie late into the third period when St. Lawrence peppered Stauber’s goalie in a heated attempt to score. Stauber deliberately and illegally lifted the net off the pylons stopping play No penalty.. The game then went to overtime where Stauber’s team prevailed. Lesson learned, cheat at all costs to win.

    Friday, December 18, 2020 Report this

  • brianlafrenier@hotmail.com

    John,

    I had read that about Pete when he was playing hockey. He finally emailed me back explaining his reason for signing on to this lawsuit.

    "Confidence in our elections is a vital part of our republic and the American people deserve to know that every legitimate vote was counted. The amicus brief that my colleagues and I signed brought a lawsuit to the Supreme Court's attention which raises concerns about the integrity of the election. The amicus brief asked the Supreme Court to examine the concerns laid out in the case and make a ruling.

    This is in no way an attempt to overturn the results of the election. By asking the courts to examine the results, my colleagues and I utilized the legal recourses at our disposal to bring our concerns before the courts. This was done openly and publicly within the bounds of the judicial system because our goal is transparency and integrity, not to subvert results or disenfranchise legitimate votes. We raised our concerns, the court did not side with us, the matter is closed, and I accept the ruling.

    On January 20, 2021, I will be in attendance for President-elect Joe Biden's inauguration".

    Friday, December 18, 2020 Report this

  • jbassing@frontiernet.net

    Brian,

    That’s the same lame letter he is ending out to everyone .

    Saturday, December 19, 2020 Report this

  • brianlafrenier@hotmail.com

    John,

    I know it's the same letter he's been writing to everyone or, the same one his letter writer is penning. It's the first one I've received in many months. It's not surprising that he hasn't grasped the impact that he and other GOP members have taken on in backing this President. Trump still thinks he has a long shot when Congress votes on January 6 and when that vote comes in that Biden will be the President, I believe he still won't be silent. A forgone conclusion. The big question is this. Will Stauber continue to back Trump like I know his fellow GOP will? They all seem to think there is a big conspiracy in voting in this country. Stauber never once mentioned the disenfranchising of voters like the Governor of Texas and Florida have done.

    Saturday, December 19, 2020 Report this